Is There a Purpose of Life? Essay

displayBetween ages, clements have metamorphosed to a different level with plethora of inventions and man-to-man realizations, yet a univers wholey acceptable answer to a prime interrogative mood like whether there is a take aim of spirit still remains as elusive as it had always been. tear down the scientists too evade this question by speculateing science throw out only answer how rather than why ( implication, 2008). This state of affairs has divided troika schools of thought one, who says there is no purpose of keep, two, who refutes the claims of the former and the third, who stays away from this debate. Thus this essay explores the views of the first and second schools of thought before glide path to its own determination.There is No purpose of spirit. People who believe there is no purpose of living stress on objective state to build their premise.Since there is no concrete evidence of why aliveness manifests in so m any(prenominal) forms or procreates, it commonly generates the inference that there is no purpose of vivification. There is no point in down the stairsestimating the incorporated intellect of the majority who find themselves pool stickless slightly what it could be the heart and soul and purpose of tone mostly because they dont find any. regular the in-depth analysis of life could only determine the act upones, but not a valid reason behind it. After an exhaustive analysis of the question, NASA came to the conclusion that life, each life, is the attribute of any system that is a) capable of replication, b) capable of every(prenominal) conversion in order to off decorate entropy and c) subject to the process of evolution(Requadt, 2006)The prey-predator cycle ultimately turns to a level playing stadium where each living component shows its purpose as if either to hire others or to be utilized by others. This cannot serve any clue as to why this high is going on, as the entire game is based on molecular activ ity at various levels, involving uncountable elements and processes under various time frames. Thus this enormity of the process itself defies any set principle to hint rough any purpose behind all these.There is no tangible or universally acceptable deduction that life stems from a single condensed form of power (as God or any superpower) that exists on and on even after the death of a living being. Thus the c at a timepts like God creates living beings with a detail purpose or purposes are mere hypotheses backed by belief. sentiment cannot be cited as evidence and therefore theories involving God as the author of life also gets eliminated.The arguments placed by this school of thought clearly show that it does not allow any room to the individual kind-hearted realizations regarding the purpose of life, as all humans do not back such realization as commonplace experience substantiating the purpose of life on earth. This brings up one point to the fore that the residual a mong humans in cognitive plane prevents them to achieve or ordinate same kind of realization or understanding approximately life or its purpose and thus this school of thought indemnifies only the findings on the objective level. However, this seems too one-sided, because the significance of subjectivity in this shorten is passing important.There is subroutine of LifeThe other school of thought that admits about life having some purpose chooses to define it as something beyond quotidian comprehension and is far bang-uper than personal fulfillment (Warren, 2004). This school relies on the model of superpower having its own purpose running behind population and maintenance of the flow of life on earth. This school of thought recognizes individual experiences on cognitive plane and uses that to substantiate their claim while argumentation about the limitation of humans or other living beings to seize the big picture from objective angle.It is true that there is no dearth of instances that defies earthly logic, as for example, some accurate predictions done by individuals or someone claiming to receive some idea in dream or experiencing strange feelings that indicates the existence of a superpower.DiscussionSince it is admitted that there are evidences regarding human inability to explain all the happenings on earth, it would be fair to say that if an issue (purpose of life) remains unresolved for so long, then it definitely hints at the inadequacy of knowledge that tries to define it.There is a distinct rest in analyzing a subject with limited range of knowledge (which is usually considered as rationality) and discovering or realizing something on cognitive plane. As for example, the purpose of life from the biological perspective is explicit that it wants to maintain the identity of the form it takes (Luisi, 2008), though gradually metamorphosing to the tune of evolution. While this trait also takes place on the temporal plane of humans it cannot be explicit like its counterpart, as this development is intangible, where an individual reaches a new plane of realization on his/her own.While it is true that the individual account of any realization cannot be taken as a proof of the idea it presents, it cannot be snub either. Then that would defy the process of development, which is evidenced by numerous human inventions that were initially considered as wild imagination of the individuals. However, individual account of any new experience on the cognitive plane is hard to hit into another individual to get the same result, mostly because of the difference in cognitive ability and consequently the great divide among individual intelligence on anything persists all along.Therefore, sporadic individual accounts of certain realization about the possible purpose of life, such as the accounts of some acknowledged great human beings who repeatedly told about a unique of discovery of our lifes connection with one supreme power, cannot settle the issue for once and all. As for example if someone says the purpose of life is to recreate yourself afresh in the highest version of the grandest vision you ever had about yourself (Walsch, 1996), some volition believe it, some will refute it and some will come to an end from commenting on it. However, not believing that there is a purpose of life will not prevent one from discovering it (How to, 2008).ConclusionPrimarily the question of whether there is any purpose of life commands the answer from the depth of cognizance about life. The above discussion clearly shows that the difference in cognitive abilities prevents humans to align their ideas about the purpose of life. While that seems disappointing, the increasing vogue of overall temporal refinement among humans shows promise to settle this issue someday, as imagination and realization both command higher touch ability of  all possible inputs including he ones that even defy the name frame of the living be ings of the earth that is, the reference frame of light. Over all it seems the discovery of the purpose of life depends on further manifestation of intellect among humans or among the major part of them to establish it as a proven conclusion.ReferencesIs there a real meaning and purpose to life? Web document. Retrieved 2 April 2008,    from http//guide.gospelcom.net/resources/meaning.phpHow to discover your life purpose in about 20 minutes. Web document. Retrieved 2 April 2008, from http//www.stevepavlina.com/blog/2005/01/how-to-discover-your-life-purpose-in-about-20-minutes/Luisi, L. P. (2008). Does Science underwrite A Purpose In Life? Web article. Retrieved 2       April 2008, from http//www.cts.cuni.cz/conf98/luisi.htmRequadt, W.E. 2006. The Meaning of Life. Book excerpt. Retrieved 2 April,            2008, from http//www.rationality.net/meaning.htmWalsch, N. D. (1996).  Conversations with God An Unco mmon Dialogue. Putnam Adult,          1st edition.Warren, R. (2004). Purpose Driven Life. Zondervan Michigan, USA. Book excerpt.    Retrieved 2 April 2008, from      http//pddocs.purposedriven.com8088/docs/pdl/samplechapters/woeaihf.pdf