The Reforms of Luther and atomic number 1 VIII The various disentangleations of the fifteenth and 16th centuries ruined Western Europes supernatural unity and convoluted in the raw ideas nearly the relationships between God, individuals and federation. In a way, they were reverberative of the earlier Renaissance in Italy, in that these tidys sought-after(a) to alternate what was perceived to be wrong in the perform service to something better. In addition, these rehabilitations, whose courses were influenced greatly by politics, take eventually to the subjection of the church service building building service to g e trulywherenmental rulers. Two of the most potent reforms, Martin Luthers Protestant religion and the Angli usher out church of Eng degrade under total heat VIII, led to root word new ideas of the relationship between religion, politics, and the individual. This relationship include similarities and differences establish on ideas that included religious and governmental reasons such(prenominal) as the reasons for reform, practices of the church, and who should be lintel of religious figures. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â While two(prenominal) reforms of Luther and henry VIII terminate in splitting from the popish Catholic church, the reasons for their separation ar almost completely antithetic. Luther, on iodin hand, was frustrated with the idea that a sinful soul could attain the righteousness undeniable to obtain salvation. He came to take that justification by trustingness alone was the road to salvation, and this one of the important driving forces crumb his reformation. In addition, he earlier set out to reform the church, but was later(prenominal) hale to create his own whimsical religious sect, as contend to Henry VIII, who just took overtop of the church in position to suit his own needs. His reasons were ofttimes less holy, and he was not loo poof for spiritual insight; alternatively, he was looking for a son. When his first wife ! could not bear him one, Henry sought to obtain a carve up from the pope, but he failed. His reform of the church in England was different, in that he took control oer the church, appointed his own bishops and different clerical figures, and took control of the land of the church. Both leadership believed in the same idea; that political leaders should control church society but for different reasons. Martin Luther argued that nobles as well as clergy were the leaders of the church and should pioneer in reform in his work Address to the brilliance of the German Nation. He later stated that political leaders, rather than all batch, should control both church and society, in special reference to the German princes of Germany and the barbarians War. Here Luther wished for the die hard and backing of the German nobles of his evolving religion, Protestantism. Henry VIII, on the other hand, wished to bem utilization control over religion and society so he could remarry in p iece to produce a manlike heir, and so he could gain control of the extensive church properties in England for the position crown. Once Henry was declared head of the English church in place of the pope, he dissolve monasteries to seize their land, which was roughly one-fourth of the total land in England at the time. Luther utilise the politicians in his area to back his religious polices as argue to Henry VIII, who used his own political influence to ferment his own policy, regardless of what the Roman Catholic Church thought. In his system, he reordered it in such a way that the king was at the top of the power twist, and was governing over the churchs practices and opinions. While their motives and purposes to leading the reformations in their countries were different, they also differed on their treatment of Roman Catholic Church practices, such as the sale of indulgences. In fact, one of the main goals of Luthers reformation was to do away with the sale altogether, due(p) to his belief that indulgences could not be ! had over salvation. Luther also extremityed to do away with the images found in churches, to allow clergy to marry, and to use the Bible as the sole authorisation it religious affairs. However, Henry VIII made his new church revert to cured practices such as celibacy, transubstantiation, and other aspects of Catholic doctrine. This affirmation of sr. beliefs helped the majority of English race charter the basic diversenesss he had made. Since religious doctrine and worship had changed very little, most people were indifferent to the administrative transformation that had occurred. The spot during which both reformations occurred was a period in which new ideas were exchanged, very much like the Renaissance. The reformations idler be seen as a religious rebirth since they revise some church doctrine with new ideas and sought to change the corrupt practices of the church. Since religion mean social status in the 16th century and there was a reform in religion, there m ust have been a change in the social class structure of the time. This can be seen by the shuffling of political power around, as is evidenced above. The ideas of Luther and Henry VIII modified the religious structure in their society but also the relationship of these leaders to the Roman Catholic Church. There are similarities and differences in Henry VIII and Martin Luthers reform ideas and methods, which include political and religious reasons. Both leaders were able to change the way people thought about religion and their lives, and the affects of these reforms can still be felt today. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment