Inequalities And Its Eeffects Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Inequalities And Its Eeffects - Essay Examplea from the World Bank, the World Health Organization, the United Nations and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and others. To deflect being accused of picking and choosing our measures, our approach in this book has been to take measures provided by official agencies rather than calculating our own (Wilkinson and Pickett 2009, pg. 18). However, this approach of the authors to prove their dead reckoning was not accepted by all the experts. They found loopholes in this methodology, particularly the statistical analysis part, and thereby found loopholes in their arguments as well. The point raise forward was, by just drawing lines or even a line of best fit based on a various variables and serial publication of data points does not hold any statistical significance, unless the statistical analyses was done. They are convinced that these statistical tables do not provide the correct picture, as sufficient ana lyses were not done. This was pointed out by Moore (2010) Drawing a line through a series of data points signals nothing concrete The authors promise that they have only if included a best-fit line through the pointsBut since they do not provide any statistical analyses, this cant be verified. Kay (2009) further adds up against the methodology and thereby the argument of the authors by pointing out how regression methods may not correctly aid in analyzing the economic and importantly social statistics. As social statistics could be influenced by various variables, and is an evolving process, it cannot be easily focused. In addition, adequate data were not given in relation to the estimated equations. Thus, if one removes the bold lines from the diagram, the pattern of points loosely looks random, and the data dominated by a few... This esssay stresses that the inequality can be measured as the one that happens betwixt the rich and the poor in a particular country, and not inequal ities between the rich countries and the poor countries. The key point or differentiation, the authors make, is that wellbeing of a countrys people, cannot be actualized or should not be judged based only on the wealth or economic status of that particular country. Instead, the focus should be far more deeper, with the economic inequalities between the rich and the poorer sections of the population mainly deciding the welfare of the people. Spatial based concentration of anything including population, industries and also income could also lead to inequalities. Authors Wilkinson and Pickett points out how more equal dispersal of resources and thereby the income status will mean fewer people will be living in shanty towns, with dirt water and food hazard.This paper makes a conclusion that these inequalities is prevalent for the past few centuries only because of the advancements particularly in economic, social and technology sphere, which took place mainly in the decease few centu ries. In the earlier centuries, human beings lived in a mostly egalitarian prehistoric hunting and gathering societies with very minimal inequalities. However, as the land advanced certain sections of the population utilizing the various advancements, progressed optimally, while leaving behind others. This inequality is now visible in various facets of human life and is leading(p) to various repercussions for the people